At the same time, the picture is not simple. Some plants are booming while others are cutting staff. Companies are investing billions in U.S. facilities, but the number of jobs created is smaller than in past eras, because today’s factories are more automated and more efficient. To understand the promise of today’s factory jobs, we need to look at how technology, policy, and people are changing what “Made in America” really means.
There is so much discussion these days around the MADE IN USA label. What does it take to use the label “Made in USA” and can you trust it when you see it?
This article will tell you everything you need to know.
Read moreWhen I wrote the chapter on what manufacturers can do to save themselves for my first book, Can American Manufacturing be Saved? Why we should and how we can, published in 2009, one of my top recommendations was to begin the Lean journey to become a Lean manufacturer.
Read moreEver since the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act (AIA) was passed in 2011, there have been bills introduced in Congress with the purported purpose of restoring inventors’ rights and fixing some of the problems generated by that Act. None of these bills were passed by both the House and Senate, and most didn’t even get out of committee for a vote. A few of these bills would have actually made matters worse, so it was a good thing they didn’t pass.
Besides changing our patent system from a “first to invent” to a “first to file,” the “America Invents Act” also created the Patent Trial and Review Board (PTAB) which has nearly destroyed inventors’ rights. According to the U S Inventors end of the year report, “The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has canceled claims in 84% of the 2,500+ patents reviewed since 2011 and most inventors do not have a half a million dollars necessary to fund a legal defense.”
Read moreThe 2nd Annual Made in America Product Showcase at The White House is about to begin and we are proud to see several MAM Members and Supporters are included, yet again! Read more
TAKE ACTION TODAY! Instructions on how to contact your local representatives are below. Read more
At the end of October, Donald Trump spoke in Gettysburg, Pa., and released a plan for his first 100 days in office. Read more
The concept of “Made in America” is slowly giving way to “Made by China … in America,” as Chinese investors are increasingly snatching up U.S.-based companies and assets and raising the eyebrows of some regulators and market spectators. Read more
Were the experts wrong about the benefits of trade for the American economy? Read more
Schumer: Feds are currently listing flatware and other products made by companies as ‘American-Made’ when they are actually produced overseas, putting companies that manufacture in the U.S., like Sherrill Manufacturing in Central, NY, at a disadvantage. Senator pushes feds to review ‘Made in America’ listings and immediately remove companies that are falsely listed. Read more
By closing loopholes in the Buy American Act, the 21st Century Buy American Act will increase demand for U.S. manufactured goods and create at least 60,000 to 100,000 U.S. jobs. Read more
Some firms have slowly been moving operations back to the U.S. Will the new TPP trade deal undo the progress? Read more
“American manufacturing is back!” breathlessly exclaim the ebullient cheerleaders in locales such as Forbes and the Boston Consulting Group. But while U.S. manufacturing may have bounced back slightly from Great Recession-lows, the reality is that America’s manufacturing recovery remains tenuous. On this National Manufacturing Day, policymakers can and should be doing much more to stimulate the growth and competitiveness of America’s manufacturing economy. Read more
Less than three months before China shocked markets with a surprise devaluation of its currency, a top Chinese exchange-rate official told a closed-door gathering that Beijing had no need for such a dramatic move. Read more
There are roughly 5.1 million fewer American manufacturing jobs now than at the start of 2001. And China is to blame for more than one-third of American jobs lost, says a new report. Read more
He said that maintaining a healthy domestic steel industry was also vital to the national security.
“We should be careful that a cost-analysis is done to make sure it takes into account jobs,” said Sweeney (D-Goucester), a vice president and general organizer with the International Association of Ironworkers union, whose members erect steel structures. “There are certain things this country has to have to protect ourselves and to be able to produce steel is very important.”
As with all bills that would impose restrictions on the Port Authority, identical legislation to Sweeney’s measure (S-2061) must also be adopted in New York State. He said he was still seeking a New York counterpart.
If Sweeney’s measure becomes law, it would apply to many of the projects slated under a $27.6 billion 10-year capital plan approved by the Port Authority in February.
The use of foreign steel in public projects became an issue in the region last year, when the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Port Authority allowed Chinese steel to be used for work on the Verrazano-Narrows and Bayonne Bridges.
Critics of Chinese-made steel, including the United Steelworkers union, complained that U.S. producers could not compete with mills in China, which pay workers as little as $15 a day and benefit from legal and financial support from the Chinese government. China is by far the world’s leading steel maker.
Sweeney said his legislation was prompted by a Star-Ledger article on the controversy in September.
The contractor for the Bayonne project, a partnership of Oklahoma-based Kiewit and the Swedish construction giant Skanska, eventually decided to use Italian steel instead of Chinese, along with some American steel.
The U.S. government already requires domestic steel to be used on public projects
that receive federal funds, and Sweeney said his bill would unburden those who pay bridge tolls by ensuring that Port Authority projects were eligible for those funds.
As in the rest of the country, steel manufacturing has been in decline in New Jersey for decades, and only a handful of operations remain, including MRP LLC in South Plainfield, which has supplied steel beams for the World Trade Center site, and a plant in Sayreville run by Gerdau Ameristeel.
The Port Authority declined to comment specifically on Sweeney’s bill. However, agency officials noted that the $1.5 billion Goethals Bridge replacement project is subject to a federal requirement that 99.9 percent of materials be produced domestically, while the agency’s own request for proposals on a $3.6 billion replacement of the Central Terminal Building at LaGuardia Airport calls for at least 51 percent domestic materials.
Daniel J. Ikenson, a trade policy specialist at the Cato Institute, said Sweeney’s measure was a misguided appeal to patriotism that would inflate the cost of public projects.
“It’s just common sense,” Ikenson said. ” Only a rudimentary understanding of supply and demand is needed to see that limiting competition for state procurement ensures that taxpayers get a smaller bang for their tax bucks.”
Last fall the agency said that it allowed the use of Chinese steel to expedite the Bayonne project, which is intended to allow larger container ships to reach terminals in Newark and Elizabeth once an expansion of the Panama Canal is completed next year.
But Sweeney rejected the notion that domestic steelmakers lacked the capacity or speed needed in such situations.
“This isn’t that hard to figure out,” Sweeney said. “If you know you’re going to build a bridge, you contact steel manufacturers in the United States and you say, I’m going to need this may tons of steel.’ They can do it.”
For the past three decades, the Republican Party has waged a dangerous assault on the very idea of public education. Tax cuts for the rich have been balanced with spending cuts to education. During the New Deal era of the 1940s to 1970s, public schools were the great leveler of America. They were our great achievement. It was universal education for all, but today it’s education for those fortunate enough to be born into wealthy families or live in wealthy school districts. The right’s strategy of defunding public education leaves parents with the option of sending their kids to a for-profit school or a theological school that teaches kids our ancestors kept dinosaurs as pets.
“What kind of future society the defectors from the public school rolls envision I cannot say. However, having spent some time in the Democratic Republic of Congo—a war-torn hellhole with one of those much coveted limited central governments, and, not coincidentally, a country in which fewer than half the school-age population goes to public school—I can say with certainty that I don’t want to live there,” writes Chuck Thompson in Better off Without Em.
Comparisons with the Democratic Republic of Congo are not that far-fetched given the results of a recent report by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which is the first comprehensive survey of the skills adults need to work in today’s world, in literacy, numeracy and technology proficiency. The results are terrifying. According to the report, 36 million American adults have low skills.
It gets worse. In two of the three categories tested, numeracy and technological proficiency, young Americans who are on the cusp of entering the workforce—ages 16 to 24—rank dead last, and is third from the bottom in numeracy for 16- to 65-year-olds.
The United States has a wide gap between its best performers and its worst performers. And it had the widest gap in scores between people with rich, educated parents and poor, undereducated parents, which is exactly what Third World countries look like, i.e. a highly educated super class at the top and a highly undereducated underclass at the bottom, with very little in the middle.
The report shows a relationship between inequalities in skills and inequality in income. “How literacy skills are distributed across a population also has significant implications on how economic and social outcomes are distributed within the society. If large proportions of adults have low reading and numeracy skills, introducing and disseminating productivity-improving technologies and work-organization practices can be hampered; that, in turn, will stall improvements in living standards,” write the authors of the report.
There is a defined correlation between literacy, numeracy and technology skills with jobs, rising wages and productivity, good health, and even civic participation and political engagement. Inequality of skills is closely correlated to inequality of income. In short, our education system is not meeting the demands of the new global environment, and the outlook is grim, given the Right’s solution is to further defund public education while ushering kids into private schools and Christian academies aka “segregation academies.” The Republican-controlled South is where you see the Right’s education strategy in action. “Inspired by home-school superstars such as Creation Museum founder Ken Ham, tens of thousands of other southern families have fled their public-school systems in order to soak their children in the anti-intellectual sitz bath of religious denial.” In other words, we’re dumb and getting dumber.
While charter schools aren’t unique to the South, conservative states tend to respond most enthusiastically to their message, which makes Republican-controlled states ground zero for the further degradation of public education. The U.S. will likely continue to poll like countries like Indonesia and Tanzania, rather than Japan and Sweden when it comes to meeting the demands of a global economy.
Despite their hype and profits, study after study show that kids in charter schools perform no better on achievement tests than kids in public schools. But the correlation between a strong public education system and social mobility is demonstrated clearly in the OECD report. A 2006 report by Michael A. McDaniel of Virginia Commonwealth University showed that states with higher estimated collective IQ have greater gross state product, citizens with better health, more effective state governments, and less violent crime. In other words, were we to invest more in public education, we’d be instantly more intelligent, healthy, safe, and financially sound.
“The principal force for convergence [of wealth] — the diffusion of knowledge — is only partly natural and spontaneous. It also depends in large part on educational policies,” writes Thomas Piketty in his 700-page bestseller Capital in the Twenty-First Century . In other words, if we really want to reduce inequality, and if we really want to be a global leader in the 21st century, we need to invest more into our education system, which requires the federal government to ensure the rich and the mega-corporations pay their share. But we need to act now.
We asked for legislation to neutralize foreign currency manipulation. They said no.
We asked for comprehensive tax reform to the double taxation of our exports through foreign border adjustable consumption taxes. They said no.
Instead, they file the Fast Track (so-called “Trade Promotion Authority”) bill to these global governance deals like the TransPacific Partnership (TPP) through Congress without any amendment or sufficient debate.
They admit they can’t pass TPP under regular procedural rules because it is so controversial… so they change the rules!
Over 170 members of Congress from both parties, last November, said they opposed Fast Track because it is constitutionally wrong and because it produces bad trade policy.
Tell Congress to oppose Fast Track and support debate under the Regular Order… the ordinary rules of debate and procedures given to every other bill before the House and Senate.
We cannot reform trade policy to grow our economy, create jobs, and protect our constitutional republic unless we stop Fast Track now.
If we get it wrong, the trade deficits will continue eroding the American dream.
We can win this. Tell Congress to oppose Fast Track to keep its power over trade treaties while protecting our sovereignty.
Sincerely,
Michael Stumo, CEO
Coalition for a Prosperous America
Trade is relevant. The U.S. trade deficit, which has grown from a little more than $70 billion in 1993, the year before NAFTA went into effect, to nearly $540 billion today, costs us jobs. Trade deficits represent lost opportunities. The bigger the trade deficit, the more jobs we could have created in the United States but didn’t. Moreover, trade agreements affect our domestic laws. Once we enter into a trade agreement, it’s not so easy to raise tariffs on trading partners that engage in egregious human rights violations—nor is it easy to exit the agreement once we find out it is bad for our economy and our job creation.
Trade also is interesting. Trade rules affect your rights in the workplace, the safety of the food you eat and how clean your water is. Trade rules can affect whether tuna canneries are allowed to tell you if your tuna is dolphin-safe or whether local grocery stores have to label the hamburger you buy with its country of origin. Trade rules can affect the price of the fancy imported cheese you like or how much North American content must be in an automobile for it to qualify for the tariff benefits of NAFTA. And trade rules also can make it easier for an employer to shut down a factory, call center or legal support office and move it overseas. Trade is anything but boring.
And the debate is certainly not over. The proposed TPP is not yet finished—the rules are still being written. Will those rules largely mimic the rules that have helped kill off nearly 6 million manufacturing jobs in the United States in just over a decade? On the other hand, will the rules help make it easier for our brothers and sisters overseas to organize and act collectively to improve their wages and working conditions? Will the rules require our trading partners to protect endangered species? Or will they make it easier for giant global corporations to attack laws banning toxic chemicals? We don’t know the answer to these questions yet—because the deal isn’t done. But if the loudest voices the administration and Congress hear belong to the global corporations who have benefited from past agreements, I can predict what the answers will be. And they won’t be answers we like. If you have not yet spoken up to tell President Obama that America can’t take another NAFTA, now is the time. The president wants to finish negotiating the agreement by October 2013. Tomorrow may be too late.
Workers at most of Cambodia’s more than 500 garment factories are on strike, demanding an increase in the minimum wage to $160 a month, double the current rate. The government has offered $100 a month.
The local human rights group LICADHO said in a statement that at least four civilians were shot dead and 21 injured in what it described as “the worst state violence against civilians to hitCambodia in 15 years.”The statement said that security forces used live ammunition to shoot directly at civilians.
|
“The use of live ammunition was prolonged and no efforts appear to have been made to prevent death and serious injury,” it said. “Reports suggest that security forces were also injured after being hit with stones.”
It was not clear whether those killed were workers or local residents who had joined in the protest. “They are anarchists, they have destroyed private and state property,” Chuon Narin, the deputy police chief, said by phone. “That is why our forces need to chase them out.” The protesters were cleared from the street, at least temporarily, by early afternoon. The violence comes at a time of political stress in the country, with the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party holding daily protests calling for Prime Minister Hun Sen to step down and call elections. |
Although the wage and election issues are not directly linked, the opposition has close ties with the country’s labor movement. Last Sunday, many workers joined a massive political rally organized by the opposition.
The workers represent a potent political force, because the garment industry is Cambodia’s biggest export earner, employing about 500,000 people. In 2012, Cambodia shipped more than $4 billion worth of products to the United States and Europe.
Mak Vin, a 25-year-old worker, said he was among those protesting for more than a week over the wage issue. He said that on Friday morning, as the workers burned car tires and shouted slogans, “hundreds” of armed police arrived and opened fire.
“They fired live bullets directly at us. I am very scared,” Mak Vin said.
There had been an earlier clash overnight, with no known fatalities.
Mak Vin said the workers were protesting only for higher wages, and would return to work once that demand was met. He said most workers were not cowed by the shooting, and would continue their strike.
Violent suppression of social and political protests has not been unusual under Hun Sen’s authoritarian government, but there have been few incidents in recent years where more than one person has been killed.
The authorities also usually shy away from using live ammunition in Phnom Penh, where the population is largely hostile to the government.
But the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights in Cambodia, Surya Subedi, said it was the third time since the disputed elections that authorities have shot into a crowd and caused fatalities. He called for an independent investigation into whether excessive force was used. He also expressed concerned about increasing violence by some demonstrators.
The standoff over wages presents Hun Sen with a dilemma, as increasing violence could drive the workers into a tighter alliance with the opposition, providing a vast pool of people for their increasingly confident street demonstrations. But the government is also close to the factory owners, whose exports fuel the economy and who are generally seen as financial supporters of Hun Sen’s ruling Cambodian People’s Party.
Last week, violence erupts in Cambodia when the Garment Manufacturers Association in called for factory owners to close their plants, ostensibly for fear of damage by protesters. The situation puts pressure both on the striking workers, who are not being paid, and the government, which relies on garment exports to power the economy.

made in america
While the President originally touted the initiative in his 2013 State of the Union address last February, Thursday’s event will be the first official launch of the program… White House To Announce Manufacturing Hubs.
Those areas, White House officials say, are among the top 20 places most adversely affected by the recession. Each neighborhood or area in the “Promise Zone” has laid out specific goals and will be held accountable by program administrators and third-party experts to track their results.
In San Antonio, Mayor Julian Castro has been applauded by the White House for his efforts to work with federal programs and investments from local businesses to revitalize neighborhoods. The Eastside area of the city has partnered with St. Philip’s College for job training programs in energy, healthcare, and aerospace/advanced manufacturing jobs, among other initiatives.
“Investing in and rebuilding hard-hit communities are important parts of the President’s plan to restore the basic bargain at the heart of the American story – that every child should have a fair chance at success. And that, no matter who you are or where you’re from, if you’re willing to work hard and play by the rules, you should be able to find a good job, feel secure in your community, and support a family,” a White House official said about tomorrow’s event.
The White House has cited the Youngstown, Ohio area as an example of success as a “manufacturing innovation institute” which has turned around a once-shuttered manufacturing warehouse into a thriving 3-D printing center. In 2012, President Obama announced his plan to invest $1 billion in a network of up to 15 similar cities.
China’s Favorite U.S. States in 2012
In 2012, China purchased nearly $109 billion worth of U.S. goods, from soybeans to scrap metal, electronic components to heavy machinery. China will undoubtedly play a significant role as importer of Made in USA as locals keep getting richer. Some estimates forecast that China may have nearly 600 million middle class consumers by the end of the decade, as measured by the World Bank’s definition of middle class.
“Our exports to China remain a bright spot for many companies, particularly with European demand weakening,” said Frisbie in a statement last week.
Even though China’s economic growth slowed last year, growth in U.S. exports to China rose 6.5% from 2011, representing an increase of $6.6 billion.
Here’s a look at the top 10 states where Chinese companies go shopping for Made in USA.
“ArcelorMittal is pleased with the Department of Defense’s decision to reinstate the longstanding requirement that steel armor plate procured for defense purposes be melted domestically. We are grateful for the support of leaders like Senator Brown who have fought tirelessly for this policy to be reinstated. This is an important decision for our hardworking employees in Ohio and nationwide. ArcelorMittal is proud to support the defense efforts of the United States through our production of steel armor plate, and we commend the Department of Defense for its decision to help ensure a vibrant industrial base in the years to come,” said John Mengel, Chief Operating Officer, ArcelorMittal USA Plate.
“As a major supplier of raw materials to the domestic steel industry, Cliffs is encouraged by the Department of Defense’s proposal to again require that all stages of steel armor plate manufacturing occur domestically. This proposed rule reflects the importance of producing strategically significant steel products in the United States from a domestic supply chain,” said Kelly Tompkins, Executive Vice President – Legal, Government Affairs and Sustainability and Chief Legal Officer at Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
Steel armor plate is used for military vehicles, tanks, and equipment. Under DoD regulations, specialty metals procured for defense purposes—including steel armor plate—must be produced in the United States. Despite more than 35 years of legal interpretation and administrative practice requiring that specialty metals be melted in the United States, DoD in 2009—in the midst of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and during a time when the demand for steel was high—published a final rule defining the word “produced,” as it applies to armor plate under the Special Metals Amendment, to include simple finishing processes. This means that armor plate melted in foreign countries, including Russia and China, could be imported and subjected to simple finishing processes in the United States and then deemed to have been “produced” domestically.
After numerous Congressional inquiries and report language questioning DoD’s interpretation of “produced,” the FY11 National Defense Authorization Act included a provision requiring a review and, if necessary, revision of the existing regulation to ensure the definition is consistent with Congressional intent (the review was required to be completed within 270 of enactment of the law, i.e., early October 2011). On July 25, 2011, DoD published its request for comment, and the deadline for public comment was September 8, 2011. Earlier this year, Brown introduced the United States Steel and Security Act, which would have required steel armor plate to be both melted and finished in the United States, not only protecting American steel jobs, but our country’s national security. Cleveland’s ArcelorMittal manufactures steel armor plate, as does Nucor.
In September 2011, Brown—along with Sens. Richard Burr (R-NC), Robert P. Casey, Jr. (D-PA), Kay Hagan (D-NC), Daniel Coats (R-IN), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Al Franken (D-MN), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)—sent a letter to Defense Undersecretary Ashton Carter urging him to revise the Department’s requirements on steel plate. A copy of that letter can be seen here. During consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act in December 2011, Brown and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) called for the DOD to expedite its review of this issue.
Yesterday, the DoD published in the Federal Register a proposed amendment to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations revising the definition of “produce” as it relates to the Specialty Metals Amendment. The proposed amendment is the result of section 823 of the FY 2011 National Defense Authorization Act, in which Congress directed DoD to review the current the definition of produced to ensure its consistency with congressional intent. There will be a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule.
Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro visited Engineering Specialties, Inc. in North Branford to see the manufacture of evacuated tube solar thermal collectors for Apricus, also a North Branford company. Left to right: Apricus Vice President Nigel Ruddell, Apricus engineer Eric Skiba, Rosa, ESI’s Vice President Carmen Ciardiello, ESI’s President Ronald Delfini, and Apricus marketing person Shannon Horsley.
Mara Lavitt/New Haven Register
By: Bridget Albert, Register Staff
balbert@newhavenregister.com / Twitter: @nhrbalbert
Apricus is a designer and manufacturer of solar hot water and hydronic heating products. Founded in 2003, Apricus is a global company with offices in the U.S., Australia and France and sales in more than 30 countries. Its North American headquarters is in Branford.
Engineering Specialties Inc. is a manufacturer of engineered metal stamping, mechanical assemblies, wire forms, springs, and other custom component parts. It is located in North Branford. It started in 1990 and now has 20 employees.
U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3, visited the factories Tuesday to learn more about their efforts to work together and meet the requirements of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Buy American Act.
The collector absorbs thermal energy from the sun and converts it into heat that can then be used for hot water, heating, cooling and industrial processes. Apricus also manufactures these units in China, which services Europe, Asia and Australia.
“This is how it should work,” DeLauro said, adding she hopes there are more such business ventures.
“We wanted someone local so we could grow the product together,” Ruddell said.
“We are a good fit and hope to bring more new products in the future,” he added.
“We jumped at the opportunity,” said Ronald Delfini, president of Engineering Specialties Inc.
“They had their blueprint but some things needed to change; being close was perfect,” said Carmen Ciardillo, vice president Engineering Specialties Inc.
To qualify under the “Buy American” act, at least 50 percent of the product must be made in the U.S.
Ruddell and Delfini said 61 percent of the AP-30C is made in North Branford, including all the stainless steel parts.
DeLauro said she could see the “ripple effect” of this type of collaboration, including the need for installation and maintenance of the systems.
Additionally, DeLauro said she could see the benefits to federal buildings that were getting updated with new heating and air conditioning systems.
Ruddell said Apricus has already been awarded several government contracts.
Delfini said since January, they have shipped 250 units, averaging production of 15 a day. A complete installed system will cost the average homeowner $8,000 to $12,000 and it will save 50 to 80 percent on heating costs.
Solar collector owners can qualify for a 30 percent federal tax credit and $2,000 tax credit in Connecticut, Ruddell said.
Delfini said the product has a life expectancy of 25 to 30 years.
____________
Call Bridget Albert at 203-789-5702. Follow her on Twitter @nhrbalbert.
















